DNA and Fingerprinting in Forensics

 One of the major occupations that I will be writing about is Forensics which does help in a huge way to

solving crimes. DNA printing has become easier to catch killers or people who have been in the crime process. With DNA that no one was not able to find the suspect easier back in the days because technology is now making a major difference these days.

DNA is huge thing in the crime especially in the FBI without technology they will not be able to catch the most dangerous suspects or criminals that finger printing machines have come to the world to help find the catcher if they are in the system. There are three methods of DNA which are multilocus probes repeated sequence of chromosomal sites, single-locus probes it shows a pair of chromosome, and the dotblot method are smaller samples of DNA which is known as HLA. DNA is use also for research to diagnose genetic disease.

DNA is not only finger printing is also provided in our blood which the criminal justice use is poking the thumb to get a drop of blood or something similar in the tissue this method is being used for which is being compared to single-locus or multilocus. Another one which the thumbprint that has swirl is the dotblot method which provides less information.

DNA printing towards technology has been a huge question with some of the justice system because some of that is question if the technology is being honest about the finger printing. The Judge should be convinced that the technology is reliable and accurate this term is called Frye hearing.  Even though DNA is being helped in the criminal justice and it had help a lot in cold cases because technology was not available back then.

The printing of DNA has been a major question by judges and juries, they are so blind by not believing the experts who are more into what the science is speaking to them experts. It being so much of the complex molecular technology is just so easy to rely on which has helped with helping more into crimes and the printing has been more of a show and tell testimony. It veils more of the story from the suspect that had convicted the crime.